A DeFi lending protocol has different failure modes than an NFT marketplace. A wallet contract can't be tested like a GameFi rewards system. We don't run the same checklist on every contract and call it done—we shift our threat model to match what actually breaks in your project type.
What we cover
DeFi protocols: Most DeFi exploits are economic, not technical. We look for oracle manipulation, MEV extraction paths, share math that drifts under load, and governance attacks that make stealing profitable. Your invariants matter more than your linter warnings.
RWA (Real World Assets): The risk lives at the seams: where on-chain state meets off-chain custody, where attestations can be replayed, where governance can silently rewrite backing assumptions. We audit the full trust chain—not just the contract code.
NFT projects: Minting rules, transfer restrictions, marketplace logic. The failure modes are specific: unauthorized duplication, ownership state desyncs, allowlist bypasses, royalty enforcement gaps. Standard reentrancy checks don't catch these.
GameFi economies: Its an economy with game mechanics on top. We test for reward loops, emission exploits, anti-farming bypasses, and marketplace manipulation. If there as a way to print infinite value through "normal gameplay," we will find it.
Wallet contracts: These fail catastrophically. One signature validation bug, one replay vector, one recovery logic mistake—and user funds are gone or permanently locked. We review authorization like an attacker: what can I sign once and replay forever?
